Old Dog, New Tricks

Smarter Freelance Writing

August 23rd, 2007

1 Lesson Learned from Lynn Johnston

On my other blog, I often make fun of the venerable “For Better or for Worse” comic strip by Lynn Johnston. In general, I think it’s been a creditable example of long-form serial storytelling: well-drawn, affecting, well-intentioned and sensitive to modern life’s joys and sorrows.

Right now, though, it’s a freakin’ train wreck.

By forcing Liz Patterson and Anthony Caine back into a romantic relationship that many readers find just plain nauseating, Johnston is squandering a lot of the goodwill she’s banked over the past decades. Liz seems to be throwing away her independence for a needy, passive-aggressive guy whose redeeming qualities are greatly exaggerated. Why is Johnston insisting on doing this?

Part of the answer may lie within this long interview with Johnston conducted by Chris Mautner. Asked about her readership’s negative reaction to the Liz/Anthony coupling, Johnston admits that Anthony is “just a shadow figure.” His backstory hasn’t been fleshed out:

The child was a very big question mark and also, what did happen to Anthony’s marriage? What really happened? All of those things I wanted to explore. I haven’t had a chance. I don’t know Anthony. (my emphasis)

At this point, I’m not sure whether Johnston can salvage her strip’s finale via a deeper understanding of Anthony Caine. However it turns out, this episode serves as a cautionary tale of how faulty character construction can wreak havoc on a work of fiction.

August 11th, 2007

A Handful of Lessons Learned from the Bloggrrl

When investigating topics, I definitely prefer experts, but I also appreciate enthusiastic neophytes. That’s why find myself making return visits to Bloggrrl.com. She’s learning how to build traffic and monetize her blog, and she approaches the process with a cheerful candor that I like.

Of particular interest to me have been her articles about 12 worthwhile forums for bloggers and making money with affiliates. Lots of chewy food for thought there. She’s also quick to admit when things don’t work out the way she planned.

 Currently, she’s running a strip poker contest. You can play along at home, if you like.

August 11th, 2007

Research Gold, Baby!

For a while now, I’ve been playing with this notion of writing a young-adult novel about carnivals and/or amusement parks. As presently conceived, the book would be an inversion of Ray Bradbury’s “Something Wicked This Way Comes,” re-mixed with H.P. Lovecraft’s “The Shadow over Innsmouth” and set during the American Bicentennial. Just what everybody’s waiting for, I know, but I’m intrigued by the possibilities.

Towards that end, I’ve been doing some preliminary research. There’s certainly good material available online, including:

 1934 Modern Mechanix “How Carnival Racketeers Fleece the Public”

Lives of the Carnies from LA Weekly

One Source of Amusement Links

The best resource, however, has proved to be a book I found in the Berkeley Public Library, “Carnival” by Arthur H. Lewis. In the late 1960s, Lewis spent six months crisscrossing the East Coast through 30 cities and saw some of the most popular midway acts, everything from the legendary “Ape Show,” in which a beautiful woman transforms into a hairy, ravening gorilla right before your very eyes, to “Spaghetti,” a murdered carnie whose family never paid for his burial and whose embalmed cadaver rested for decades in a glass-enclosed coffin in a Laurinburg, NC garage.

Lewis’s narrative is filled with great details that I wouldn’t have been likely to stumble across elsewhere. Like what it’s like to wrestle a chimp for more than ten seconds. Or how a third-generation tap-dancing donniker man spends his days. Or what exactly a jam auction is. Or how an “Ikey Heyman” axle works on a wheel of fortune.

Intrigued? Well, go hustle up a copy of Lewis’s book, or wait until my fictional version is finished.

The only drawback is that this copy of “Carnival” is now overdue. So I guess I had better sit down tomorrow and take some extensive notes.

August 8th, 2007

William Gibson Gets It Right

The Chronicle ran my review of William Gibson’s new novel, “Spook Country,” today. Even started it on the front of the Datebook section, to boot. Yay!

I don’t think, though, the review conveys how impressed I was by Gibson’s plotting this time. I had a hard time maintaining my interest in the book during its middle section, but once I twigged to what Gibson was up to, I was bowled over by his cleverness. “Spook Country” is another great book from one of our smartest cultural critics.

August 1st, 2007

5 Lessons Learned from Dean Koontz

I’ve read 15 or 16 novels by Dean Koontz, and some of them were pretty damn good, including “Intensity,” “Watchers,” “Whispers” and “Night Chills.” For a while in my twenties, I haunted used bookstores for copies of the paperbacks published under his many pseudonyms.

In my opinion, however, the best book he’s written is one that’s long out of print and never mentioned in the “Also by” list of his recent best-sellers. It’s “How to Write Best-Selling Fiction,” published by Writer’s Digest Books in 1981.

That might sound like an over-reaching title, especially considering that Koontz was far from a household name when he published his manifesto. But time has certainly proved him right. He publishes two hardcovers a year and achieves terrific sales. By some accounts he’s now America’s No. 1 thriller writer.

I found a used copy of “Best-Selling Fiction” in Berkeley nearly 25 years ago, and since then it has informed many of my views of what popular fiction is and should be. I still drag it out from time to remind myself of some of Koontz’s advice. I also wish I had taken better care of my copy, as dealers are now asking upwards of $800 for one in mint condition.

I obviously can’t reprint huge chunks of “How to Write Best-Selling Fiction,” but I’ll highlight some of the points that made the biggest impression on me. If you don’t want to pay a small fortune for a complete copy, well, see what inter-library loan can do for you.

1. Immediately plunge your hero or heroine into terrible trouble.

I think this is the No. 1 lesson I took away from the book. In real life, I tend to shy away from conflict, but that’s the absolutely worst thing you can do in fiction. Koontz writes about the importance of threatening your protagonist with terrible trouble in the very first pages of the manuscript:

If you fail to interest and entertain the reader right from the start, you will surely lose him long before the end of the first chapter.

He goes on to give several examples from classic literature and from his own early novels.

2. Don’t make it easy on your hero.
 

Koontz discusses the 7,500-word action scene that opens his novel “Whispers” and shows how he achieved maximum impact with it. He writes:

In its structure, each action scene should be a microcosmic representation of the larger structural pattern of the novel itself… Hit your hero with startling and/or frightening complications, one after the other. Be tough on him. If you keep those words in mind, your action scenes will be well-rounded, exciting and satisfyingly long.

3. Complications must never arise because of a character’s stupidity.

Yeah, but you have to play fair while being tough. If the hero’s an idiot, you can’t care about his fate.

 

 

4. Read, read, read.

 

Koontz provides commentary on nearly 100 pre-1980 writers who exemplify his notion of a best-selling author. I’ve always be an omnivorous reader, but there were a plenty of people on his list whose work I had not explored thoroughly in 1983, from Richard Condon to Cornell Woolrich to Richard Stark.

 

 

5. People have vastly different ideas of what’s funny.

 

This is not a lesson I learned from “Best-Selling Fiction.” Rather, it is one that has become painfully obvious to me from reading Koontz’s recent books. Over the years, he’s taken to injecting more “comedy” into his novels, creating off-kilter characters who indulge in allegedly humorous banter and wacky hijinx.

 

Sorry, but I wish he’d cut it out. When it comes to funny, Koontz and I are on entirely different wavelengths. I sit there with an expression on my face that could win me the Buster Keaton Lookalike Contest. Just give me the escalating tension and dispense with the shtick, OK, Dean?

August 1st, 2007

1 Lesson Learned from Nancy Nall

Detroit-based freelance editor and writer Nancy Nall runs a very smart eponymous blog. She’s a veteran of the daily newspapering game and obviously knows what she’s talking about when she discusses journalistic matters. She’s also a fan of Warren Zevon, which gives her bonus points.

I was struck today by her mini-essay on subject and theme. You should read the whole thing, but here’s what she’d probably call the “nut graph”:

It’s been my experience, as a writer and an editor, that when you’re blocked on a piece of writing the problem is one of two: 1) You haven’t done enough reporting; or 2) You don’t understand the theme. What’s it really about? Does this paragraph illuminate that? If not, you’ve lost your way. The subject is the path, the theme lights the path.

|